Movement speed is biased by prior experience.

J Neurophysiol · 2014 · PMC4527989 · PMID 24133220

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0040

closest p · 0.1× alpha

0.0590

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP = 0.004actually significant

A two-factor rmANOVA confirmed that there was a highly significant GROUP × TARGET SPEED interaction [ F (3,48) = 5.047, P = 0.004].

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantP = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

3 C ), whereas it decreased slightly in the slow group, resulting in a significant TIME × GROUP interaction [ F (1,16) = 5.762, P = 0.029] and a marginally significant effect of TIME [ F (1,8) = 5.021, P = 0.055].

also in 26,082 other papers

showed a trendP = 0.059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Between-group, post hoc t -tests on the reduction of movement-speed variability was significantly changed for the fast training group [ t (16) = −2.570, P = 0.021] and showed a trend for the slow group [ t (16) = −2.037, P = 0.059].

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.