a significant trendP = 0.021
When the involved wrists were compared between the two groups, there was a significant trend toward an increased incidence of nondominant wrist involvement in group 1 patients (76.7% versus 50.9%, P = 0.021) ( Table 1 ).
When the involved wrists were compared between the two groups, there was a significant trend toward an increased incidence of nondominant wrist involvement in group 1 patients (76.7% versus 50.9%, P = 0.021) ( Table 1 ).