highly significantP < 0.0001
BDI and IDS-SR 30 showed a highly significant intercorrelation ( r = 0.82, P < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.67–0.91).
BDI and IDS-SR 30 showed a highly significant intercorrelation ( r = 0.82, P < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.67–0.91).
Comparison of AUC values for the IDS-SR 30 total score, IDS-SR 30 cognitive subscore, IDS-SR 30 subscale and BDI yielded significant differences between IDS-SR 30 total and IDS-SR 30 somatic ( P = 0.02) as well as IDS-SR 30 cognitive and IDS-SR 30 somatic ( P = 0.04) while the difference between the BDI and IDS-SR 30 somatic subscore failed to reach statistical significance ( P = 0.09).