highly significantP<0.01
Duration of deafness was seen to be highly significant (P<0.01) with the best performance group being deaf for 7.3 years on average and the two worse groups being deaf for 17.9 years.
Duration of deafness was seen to be highly significant (P<0.01) with the best performance group being deaf for 7.3 years on average and the two worse groups being deaf for 17.9 years.
The performance in the periodic bar masking pattern was significantly better than in the random dot pattern (P<0.05) and showed a trend for being better than in the random bar pattern (P<0.1), whereas there was no significant difference in performance between the random dot and the random bar patterns.