borderline non-significantp = 0.06
The values reflected for females was borderline non-significant (−0.11, CI −0.22–0.006, p = 0.06).
The values reflected for females was borderline non-significant (−0.11, CI −0.22–0.006, p = 0.06).
Together with the borderline significance ( p = 0.06) for PA on LBP in stratified analysis for females it is tempting to indicate a relationship.
Analysis showed a weak trend of decreasing low back pain with moderate/high physical activity levels, but this association was not significant.
Gender stratification For both men and women there was an overall trend of reduced LBP with time when using baseline as reference.
Level of PA showed an increasing trend during follow-up, with lowest level of reported moderate/high PA at T5 (44 %) and highest at T17 (59 %).
Results Low back pain was significantly influenced by time and overall there was a decreasing trend of low back pain prevalence throughout the follow-up.