Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Sign Tracking, but Not Goal Tracking, is Resistant to Outcome Devaluation.

Front Neurosci · 2015 · PMC4679928 · PMID 26733783

2
hedged sentences
0.1000
closest p · 2.0× alpha
0.1000
boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp < 0.1so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Examination of the individual components of the PCA index revealed that, after reward devaluation, paired goal tracker rats, compared to unpaired goal tracker rats, showed a trend toward greater probability of lever deflection relative to receptacle entry during the CS (Figure 5C ; Z = 2.10, corrected p < 0.1); a significantly greater bias toward lever deflection over receptacle entry during the CS (Figure 5D ; Z = 2.63, p < 0.05); and a trend toward lower latency to interact with the lever, relative to the receptacle (Figure 5E ; Z = −1.67, uncorrected p < 0.1).

also in 53,322 other papers

a trend toward significanceno p-value reported
Where appropriate, p -values are reported after correction for multiple comparisons by the Holm-Sidak method; an adjusted p < 0.05 was considered significant, and p < 0.1 (adjusted and/or unadjusted) was considered a trend toward significance.

also in 3,729 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.