Testing necessary regional frontal contributions to value assessment and fixation-based updating.

Nat Commun · 2015 · PMC4682105 · PMID 26658289

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0500

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantP= 0.05actually significant

There was a marginally significant effect of group on absolute value rating difference (between-subjects Kruskal–Wallis test: H 3 =7.74, P= 0.05; Fig. 5a ).

also in 26,082 other papers

showed a trendP =0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Post hoc tests showed a trend toward a difference between the DMF and LF groups (Bonferroni corrected Mann–Whitney U -test: Z =2.55, P =0.07, two-tailed), and controls ( Z =2.40, P =0.1), and no other notable differences ( Z ≤1.36, P ⩾0.9).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.