borderline significanceP = 0.061
When comparing the use of F4H5, patients treated with F4H5 had less emulsification bubbles than those not treated with F4H5, reaching borderline significance ( P = 0.061, Figure 4 ).
When comparing the use of F4H5, patients treated with F4H5 had less emulsification bubbles than those not treated with F4H5, reaching borderline significance ( P = 0.061, Figure 4 ).
Discussion There is an increasing trend in the use of smaller-gauge instrumentation for vitreoretinal procedures.
However, the amount of emulsification in the anterior chamber measured through gonioscopy showed a trend toward less emulsification after F4H5 wash, which was borderline significant regarding the small sample size of the trial (Figure 4 ).