a strong trendp = 0.08
In three independent preparations, no difference in pERK1/2 abundance could be detected ( Fig 10A and 10B ), however, 20 nM prorenin caused a strong trend towards increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation (p = 0.08).
In three independent preparations, no difference in pERK1/2 abundance could be detected ( Fig 10A and 10B ), however, 20 nM prorenin caused a strong trend towards increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation (p = 0.08).