When comparing the indications for caesarean sections between the two groups, although there was a trend of more operations for suspected fetal distress and fewer for prolonged labor progress in the misoprostol group, this did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.683)[ Table 3 ].
← all excerpts
Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
1
0.6830
0.6830