near-significantp = 0.056
We then performed a 4 (Area) × 2 (Sex) × 3 (Treatment; sham, HI normothermic, and HI hypothermic) repeated measures ANOVA using just the measurements from the contralateral hemisphere and found a significant effect of Area [ F (3,156) = 343.947, p < 0.05], a near-significant Sex effect [ F (1,52) = 3.807, p = 0.056], and trend for a significant Treatment × Sex interaction [ F (2,52) = 2.473, p = 0.09] (see Table 3 for averages and standard errors for each subregion for all groups).