a statistical trendp = 0.0
Furthermore, there was a statistical trend for the effect of group [ F (1, 30) = 3.6; MSE = 105309.68; p = 0.0 7; η p 2 = 0.11], indicating that the BH group was faster than the PH group.
Furthermore, there was a statistical trend for the effect of group [ F (1, 30) = 3.6; MSE = 105309.68; p = 0.0 7; η p 2 = 0.11], indicating that the BH group was faster than the PH group.
The main effect of group was not significant [ F (1, 30) = 2.9; MSE = 854.68; p = 0.1 0; η p 2 = 0.09] but there was a statistical trend toward a Modality × Group interaction [ F (2, 60) = 3.2; MSE = 373.14; p = 0.06; ε = 0.86; η p 2 = 0.10], indicating that the P1 peaked earlier in the AV condition compared to the A-only condition and the A+V measure for the PH group [ F (2, 29) = 7.1; p = 0.003; η p 2 = 0.33] but the differences in the BH group did not reach statistical significance [ F (2, 29) = 0.3; p = 0.78 ; η p 2 = 0 . 02 ].