nominally significantP = 0.01
There was a small, nominally significant effect of mtDNA type on survival ( χ 2 = 14.85, P = 0.01) and a significant effect of food type ( χ 2 = 26.95, P = 6.04 e -06).
There was a small, nominally significant effect of mtDNA type on survival ( χ 2 = 14.85, P = 0.01) and a significant effect of food type ( χ 2 = 26.95, P = 6.04 e -06).
The correlation between CV MALES and CV FEMALES was borderline significant when samples were averaged across the four food types ( r = 0.93, d.f. = 2, t = 3.58, P = 0.07; Figure 6C ).The global comparison across individual vials is shown in Figure 6H ( r = 0.10, d.f. = 2397, t = 5.10, P = 3.64 e -07), evidencing a symmetrical pattern about the line of equality.
The G × G × E interaction term was marginally nonsignificant ( F = 1.17, P = 0.08).