Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Mitonuclear Epistasis for Development Time and Its Modification by Diet in Drosophila.

Genetics · 2016 · PMC4858792 · PMID 26966258

3
hedged sentences
0.0100
closest p · 0.2× alpha
0.0800
boldest claim

The sentences

nominally significantP = 0.01actually significant
There was a small, nominally significant effect of mtDNA type on survival ( χ 2 = 14.85, P = 0.01) and a significant effect of food type ( χ 2 = 26.95, P = 6.04 e -06).

also in 7,732 other papers

borderline significantP = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The correlation between CV MALES and CV FEMALES was borderline significant when samples were averaged across the four food types ( r = 0.93, d.f. = 2, t = 3.58, P = 0.07; Figure 6C ).The global comparison across individual vials is shown in Figure 6H ( r = 0.10, d.f. = 2397, t = 5.10, P = 3.64 e -07), evidencing a symmetrical pattern about the line of equality.

also in 11,409 other papers

marginally nonsignificantP = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The G × G × E interaction term was marginally nonsignificant ( F = 1.17, P = 0.08).

also in 448 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.