Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Linguistic Markers of Processing Trauma Experience in Women's Written Narratives During Different Breast Cancer Phases: Implications for Clinical Interventions.

Eur J Psychol · 2015 · PMC4873081 · PMID 27247683

3
hedged sentences
0.0700
closest p · 1.4× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
For the cognitive processes category the factor therapy approached significance, F (1,18) = 3.75, p = .07, thus suggesting a greater use of cognitive words for women receiving biological therapy.

also in 8,237 other papers

marginally significantp = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Results demonstrated a significant increase in the positive emotions category for the entire group of women, with particular relevance for the biological therapy group of women, and a marginally significant (p = .07) greater use of words indicating cognitive processes for women receiving biological therapy.

also in 26,082 other papers

an increasing trendno p-value reported
In observational terms, we can read an interesting dynamic: a steady increase in the use of negative emotion words in the group receiving chemotherapy (the means were 3.52, 7.72, and 8.09, respectively, for T1, T2, and T3) compared with the biological therapy group, which showed an increasing trend at T2 and decreased again at T3 (5.98, 8.63, and 6.82, respectively, for T1, T2, and T3).

also in 63,971 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.