Does it make sense evaluating cardiac resynchronization therapy in the elderly regardless of the type of the device?

J Geriatr Cardiol · 2016 · PMC4921552 · PMID 27403149

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0590

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0590

boldest claim

The sentences

only marginally significantP = 0.059so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Whereas, relative risk reduction in the CRT-P group was only marginally significant ( P = 0.059).

also in 5,085 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.