Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Conceptual grounding of language in action and perception: a neurocomputational model of the emergence of category specificity and semantic hubs.

Eur J Neurosci · 2016 · PMC4982106 · PMID 26660067

2
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0660
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < 0.001actually significant
The four‐way anova run on the data from all 12 areas revealed a main effect of ModSpecificity ( F 2,11 = 2345, P < 0.001), with generally more CA cells and therefore higher assembly‐cell density in the multimodal than in the secondary mesomodal ( t 12 = 48.9, P < 0.001), and in the secondary than in the primary unimodal ( t 12 = 14.6, P < 0.001) areas; in addition, a highly significant interaction of the factors ExtraPeri, ModSpecificity, FrontoTemp and WordType ( F 2,11 = 137.6, P < 0.001) emerged, confirming that CA topographies (i.e. the distributions of their neurons over the areas) differed between word types.

also in 132,142 other papers

approached significanceP = 0.066so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The three‐way anova run on the data from the perisylvian areas did not provide strong evidence for word types differences across areas (although the respective interaction of topography with word type approached significance: F 2,11 = 3.05, P = 0.066).

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.