an overall trendp = 0.082
While a difference in TAG (T2 < T3, p = 0.04) was noted, the MANOVA only showed an overall trend ( p = 0.082) for the effect of 25(OH)D on TAG ( Table 2 ). 3.2.
While a difference in TAG (T2 < T3, p = 0.04) was noted, the MANOVA only showed an overall trend ( p = 0.082) for the effect of 25(OH)D on TAG ( Table 2 ). 3.2.
However, it must be noted that the overall effect was marginally significant ( Table 3 ).
While MANOVA showed that sVCAM in T1 is greater than that in T3 on average (T1 > T3 p = 0.04), the overall MANOVA effect of 25(OH)D on sVCAM only approached significance with a p value of 0.091 ( Table 3 ).