Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Intrusive effects of semantic information on visual selective attention.

Atten Percept Psychophys · 2016 · PMC5013139 · PMID 27381630

2
hedged sentences
0.0550
closest p · 1.1× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

a strong trendp = .055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
A main effect emerged of semantic relation on RTs [ F (1, 20) = 5.26, p = .033, η p 2 = .208], with targets responded to faster on SR objects (865 ms) than on NR objects (882 ms), and a strong trend for a main effect of exposure duration, with participants finding the target faster after 1,250 ms [ F (1, 20) = 4.14, p = .055, η p 2 = .171; 886 and 862 ms for the 750 ms and 1,250 ms durations, respectively], but no interaction between the two [ F (1, 20) = 2.31, p = .144, η p 2 = .103].

also in 5,725 other papers

a marginal trendp = .070so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Accuracy showed no main effect of semantic relationship or exposure duration ( F s < 1), but there was a marginal trend toward an interaction [ F (1, 29) = 3.53, p = .070, η p 2 = .108], driven by higher accuracy for the SR object at 500 ms and for the NR object at 2,000 ms, though neither of these were significantly different.

also in 626 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.