Convergent validity: agreement between accelerometry and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire in college-age Saudi men.

BMC Res Notes · 2016 · PMC5016864 · PMID 27608684

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0520

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0520

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The differences between the GPAQ and the accelerometer estimations of sedentary time approached significance (p = 0.052), and the underestimation of sedentary time increased with increasing levels of PA.

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.