Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Detecting Visual Function Abnormality with a Contrast-Dependent Visual Test in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

PLoS One · 2016 · PMC5017771 · PMID 27611680

3
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0010
boldest claim

The sentences

a significant trendp < 0.001actually significant
After adjusting for the effects of potential confounding factors such as age, sex, hypertension, duration of diabetes, biochemical data, and cataract status, a significant trend was observed for all contrast conditions ( p for trend p < 0.001).

also in 9,775 other papers

borderline significanceno p-value reported
In the younger age group (age ≤ 60 y/o), as shown in Table 6 , all the DM groups had significantly lower scores in all contrast conditions (except the non-DR group, which at 25% contrast showed borderline significance) than did the non-DM controls.

also in 7,017 other papers

borderline significantno p-value reported
Significant or borderline significant differences were observed among all the DM patient groups as compared with controls at all contrast levels in the age group of ≤60 y/o.

also in 11,409 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.