marginally significantp = 0.09
Main effect of language was marginally significant, F (1, 40) = 3.03, p = 0.09, η 2 = 0.07.
Main effect of language was marginally significant, F (1, 40) = 3.03, p = 0.09, η 2 = 0.07.
However, this effect did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.21).
Switch costs were not modulated by the type of background cue either, although the interaction between language and cue type appeared to be trending toward marginal significance ( F > 1).