Measuring Mentalizing Ability: A Within-Subject Comparison between an Explicit and Implicit Version of a Ball Detection Task.

PLoS One · 2016 · PMC5056736 · PMID 27723814

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A 4 x 2 repeated measures ANOVA on the percentage of misses, with condition (P+A+, P+A-, P-A+, P-A-) and version (implicit, explicit) as factors, showed a trend toward a significant effect of condition (F(3, 81) = 2.67, p = 0.07; Greenhouse-Geisser corrected).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.