marginal significancep =.062
A marginal significance was found between SL–SH ( Z =−1.87, p =.062) but no significant difference was found between QL–QH ( p >.05).
A marginal significance was found between SL–SH ( Z =−1.87, p =.062) but no significant difference was found between QL–QH ( p >.05).
Prosody made a marginally significant difference in the unexpected conditions (SL–QL: t (38)=−1.80, p =.080), but not in the expected conditions ( p >.05).
They were significantly faster and showed a trend for higher accuracy compared to nonmusicians, which is in line with studies on increased pitch sensitivity for musicians in linguistic tasks ( Alexander et al., 2005 , Deguchi et al., 2012 , Maess et al., 2001 , Magne et al., 2006 , Schön et al., 2004 ).