borderline significantP = 0.063
OS for the ascending and descending types Overall, PFS was higher for the ascending type than descending type; this trend was borderline significant (73.7% and 66.2%, respectively; P = 0.063).
OS for the ascending and descending types Overall, PFS was higher for the ascending type than descending type; this trend was borderline significant (73.7% and 66.2%, respectively; P = 0.063).
Compared with NACT + RT, there was a trend toward a higher OS rate with CCRT and NACT + CCRT, but the correlation did not reach statistical significance ( Fig 2A ; P = 0.172).