nominally significantP ≤ 0.05
The higher relative abundance for these taxa was nominally significant in carriers ( P ≤ 0.05), but non-significant after correction for multiple testing which is not unexpected given the small sample size.
The higher relative abundance for these taxa was nominally significant in carriers ( P ≤ 0.05), but non-significant after correction for multiple testing which is not unexpected given the small sample size.