Neural correlates of working memory development in adolescent primates.

Nat Commun · 2016 · PMC5105196 · PMID 27827365

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0000

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.1000

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP =7.2 × 10 −34actually significant

This represented a highly significant difference (two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with factors young/adult stage, and individual monkey; F 1,304 =189.7 for main effect of stage, P =7.2 × 10 −34 ).

also in 82,756 other papers

failed to reach significanceP =0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In contrast, the difference in cue period activity failed to reach significance ( t -test, t 229 =1.74, P =0.08).

also in 2,311 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceP >0.1so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

of the population tuning curves was 35.4° in the young and 27.6° in the adult for the cue period, a significant difference (permutation test, P <0.005), and 28.1° in the young versus 24.2° in the adult for the delay period, though the latter contrast did not reach statistical significance (permutation test, P >0.1).

also in 75,868 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.