Do You Read How I Read? Systematic Individual Differences in Semantic Reliance amongst Normal Readers.

Front Psychol · 2016 · PMC5118465 · PMID 27920731

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0890

closest p · 1.8× alpha

0.0890

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.089so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was a marginally significant interaction between consistency and priming in reaction times [ F (1, 30) = 3.09, p = 0.089], but most importantly, the three way interaction between group, consistency and priming was also significant [ F (1, 30) = 4.18, p = 0.050].

also in 15,194 other papers

difference was apparentno p-value reported

In Experiment 1 we sub-grouped participants according to the SR index, and as predicted, the high SR readers showed a significantly larger imageability effect than low SR readers for inconsistent words in errors, but no such difference was apparent for consistent words.

also in 455 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.