“difference was apparent”

This difference was apparent regardless of whether the minor allele is associated with higher (Δmean |log 2 (aFC)| = −0.277; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test: W = 928,592, P = 1.39 × 10 −50 ) or lower expression (Δmean |log 2 (aFC) = −0.268; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test: W = 967,228, P = 2.97 × 10 −47 ), consistent with a model of stabilizing selection whereby gene expression is maintained within an optimal range.

The results showed that the maximum difference was apparent at 2 kHz (29.9 ± 1.3 dB vs. 24.6 ± 0.5 dB, P = 0.0001) (Mitchell et al. 2009 ).

A similar tendency was noticed for NF-ƙB, for which the difference was apparent at the mRNA level, where the NF-ƙB transcript was significantly more abundant in the liver ( p < 0.001 ) and adipose tissue ( p < 0.001 ) of obese horses.

This difference was apparent at discharge and appeared to be caused by access site bleedings (0.9 vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001).

While no difference was observed between the LVF ( M = 0.01 ± 0.01) and RVF ( M = 0.002 ± 0.01) for incongruent trials, t (46) = −0.72, p = .956, d = −0.10, a difference was apparent for congruent trials such that the dual-task cost in the RVF ( M = 0.11 ± 0.02) was greater than in the LVF ( M = 0.03 ± 0.01), t (46) = 3.71, p = .001, d = 0.54.

However, a significant difference was apparent in the eLF between the LDF group and the NLF group ( p ≤ 0.001).

The material difference was apparent across the chronic rodent removal forces from rodents, which were significantly different ( p < 0.001) between Gold (1.82 ± 1.38) and Pt-Ir (3.76 ± 1.27) across all time points.

Zenith‐to‐nadir difference No significant effect of training was observed in MCAv mean ( P = 0.837); however, a difference was apparent for MAP ( P = 0.002), with the RE‐trained showing a significantly greater zenith‐to‐nadir difference (see Table 4 ). 4.

In the open-field test, no statistically significant difference was apparent between young and elderly mice, with the exception of the number of rearing on the walls, which was higher in young mice ( p = 0.007, Figure 3 B).

When examining global precedence, a significant group difference was apparent indicating a larger global processing advantage in the low AQ group, when compared with the high AQ group ( p < .01; see Fig. 2 ).

Results: Over the intervention phase (an aggregate score including all post-allocation timepoints to day-five) a group difference was apparent in favour of WoB for NA (WoB-Ash n=448, NA -0.158, p=0.010) but no differences were detected for PA or K10 and differences were not detected at week six.

This difference was apparent as early as 8 weeks when the animals showed no overt signs of the disease onset ( Figure 3E , n = 8 WT/11 Hemi, p < 0.01).

1 , B and C ) confirmed that loss of ONL thickness was pronounced in albino Abca4 −/− mice; the difference was apparent when albino Abca4 −/− mice were compared with albino wildtype (BALB/cByJ) mice at ages 9 and 12 months ( Fig. 1 B ) (∗∗ p < 0.01, two-way ANOVA and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test).

In contrast, a significant difference was apparent between breeds in their ability to discriminate object location (F 1,16 = 9.20; p = 0.01) and in post-hoc testing, the DRs of Wistar rats was significantly different from zero (t 7 = 4.23, p < 0.01), while the DRs of GK rats was not (t 9 = 1.94, p = 0.08).

Quantitative results are described in more detail elsewhere, 27 but in brief over the intervention phase (an aggregate score including all postallocation timepoints to day 5), a group difference was apparent in favour of WoB for negative affect (WoB-Ash n=448, NA −0.158, p=0.010), but no differences were detected for positive affect or psychological distress and differences were not detected at week 6.

Sex differences A significant sex difference was apparent in the rate of progression of cognitive decline as measured by CDR‐SB in untreated NACC AD participants ( P = 0.02) with females associated with more rapid cognitive decline compared to males (Figure 3A , dashed lines).

However, the mean ± SD difference was apparent at 9 h post-surgery in the three study groups (TD: 1.4 ± 0.95, BD: 0.4 ± 0.3, and SD: 3.3 ± 2.5; p > 0.05; Figure 2 ).

Additionally, a considerable difference was apparent in the GA‐CG group compared to the GA group ( p < 0.05) (Figure 5 ). 3.5.

buccal sites ( p < 0.05); additionally, a statistically significant difference was apparent between the distal and a combination of buccal and lingual sites ( p < 0.05).

Compared to the advanced stage, the difference in CMT in the atrophic stage was significant ( p < 0.001); nevertheless, the difference was apparent in the severe stage ( p = 0.068).

Of note, no significant difference was apparent between patients with low-volume + cT4 and high-volume+≤cT3 ( P =0.1345).

No significant genotypic difference was apparent between male WT and GRM5 AA/AA mice ( t (22) = 1.19, p = 0.25; Fig. 3 A’’ ).

No significant difference was apparent between across and within hemifield accuracy, p = 0.29).

Unlike the GOLD classification, however, no significant difference was apparent among STAR stages for the frequency of individuals with a history of asthma ( P = 0.33 for heterogeneity).

No significant difference was apparent in perception of cancer cure between women who chose surveillance and those who chose surgery ( p =0.34).