Social Monitoring Matters for Deterring Social Deviance in Stable but Not Mobile Socio-Ecological Contexts.

With respect to the difference in number of mazes solved and number of mazes indicated as solved, participants in the low mobility condition over-reported more than those in the high mobility condition on a marginally significant level, t (107) = 1.82, p = 0.072, d = .293, 95% CI [-.037, .850].

also in 26,082 other papers

Moreover, even though the social monitoring cue had a greater impact on deterring cheating in the low mobility condition compared to the high mobility condition, the difference did not reach statistical significance, B = .15, SE = .16, t = .91, F (1, 153) = 0.83, p = .364, 95% CI [-.190, .631].

also in 111,027 other papers