The Concurrent Programming of Saccades.

This was confirmed with separate two-way ANOVA’s with sequence order (VR or RV) as one factor and either distance (5 levels: -1.5, -0.75, No Shift, 0.75, 1.5 degrees of visual angle) or direction (3 levels: No Shift, 10 or 20 angular degrees) as the other (all p’s>.164; although note that a trend analysis of RV latencies as function of distance reveals a marginal trend towards an effect: F(1, 9) = 4.334, MSE = 1.469.196; p = .067, η 2 = .325).

also in 626 other papers

For both VR movements and RV movements there was generally a significant, or at least a strong trend towards a, shortening of their latencies for both first and second saccades when they were being executed as part of a 2-step movement compared with when they were executed in isolation (1 tailed tests—VR: V alone vs.

also in 5,725 other papers