Does waterfall aerosol influence mucosal immunity and chronic stress? A randomized controlled clinical trial.

J Physiol Anthropol · 2017 · PMC5237191 · PMID 28086991

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0540

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0550

boldest claim

The sentences

a clear trendp = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

regression, p = 0.000, R 2 = 0.615), and a clear trend to a waterfall-specific beneficial influence when compared to the WF– group (lin. regression, p = 0.054, R 2 = 0.179) (Fig. 4 ).

also in 19,460 other papers

a statistical trendp = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A comparison of IgA titers of both intervention groups (WF+ and WF–) with the non-intervention control group with a linear mixed model (LMM1) shows no significant difference but a statistical trend ( p = 0.055) on day 16 of the WF+ group, compared to that of the CO group (Fig. 2 ).

also in 2,798 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.