Continuous vs. intermittent neurofeedback to regulate auditory cortex activity of tinnitus patients using real-time fMRI - A pilot study.

Neuroimage Clin · 2017 · PMC5278116 · PMID 28154796

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0570

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0840

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = 0.057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Neurofeedback runs - region-of-interest analysis Over all sessions, the average activity of the individual region-of-interest within the auditory cortex (percent signal change in comparison to rest condition) was significantly lower than zero for the continuous group ( t -test, p = 0.0046) while the intermittent group only showed a trend towards down-regulation (p = 0.057, see Fig. 4 A).

also in 53,322 other papers

a trend towards significancep = 0.084so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Additionally, the difference between the pre-FB session and the six weeks follow-up showed a trend towards significance ( t -test, p = 0.084).

also in 2,760 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.