Remembering that big things sound big: Sound symbolism and associative memory.

It is important to note, however, that the magnitude of this difference was not as large as those seen in previous research (e.g., Klink, 2000 ), who reported a highly significant difference for the majority of tested word pairs (i.e., p < 0.001).

also in 132,142 other papers

Only the effect of nonword size approached significance ( F 2 (1, 26) = 3.97, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.13), with large nonwords eliciting more “sized” responses than small nonwords ( M = 0.22, SEM = 0.03 and M = 0.13, SEM = 0.03, respectively).

also in 8,237 other papers

The item analyses revealed a significant effect of congruency ( F 2 (1, 26) = 11.75, η 2 p = 0.31) and a marginally significant interaction ( F 2 (1, 26) = 3.59, p = 0.069, η 2 p = 0.12), and no effect of nonword size ( F 2 (1, 26) = 0.24, p = 0.63).

also in 26,082 other papers