marginally significantp = 0.061
3b ) and marginally significant difference in the 5th rank subject (χ 2 = 5.60, p = 0.061; Fig. 3b ).
3b ) and marginally significant difference in the 5th rank subject (χ 2 = 5.60, p = 0.061; Fig. 3b ).
2h ) rank subjects, whereas SUL administration decreased, although it did not reach statistical significance, a number of stereotypy in the 5th rank subject (Z = 1.78, p = 0.075; Fig. 2h ).