borderline significanceP =0.06
Although this difference in prevalence of SA risk was not significantly different (borderline significance at P =0.06), it may be a clinically meaningful difference.
Although this difference in prevalence of SA risk was not significantly different (borderline significance at P =0.06), it may be a clinically meaningful difference.
Nonlinemen had a greater prevalence of high SA risk than linemen, although this difference only approached significance (33% vs 15%, respectively, χ 2 =3.6; P =0.06; Table 2 ).