Effectiveness of a neuropsychological treatment for confabulations after brain injury: A clinical trial with theoretical implications.

PLoS One · 2017 · PMC5336256 · PMID 28257420

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0510

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0770

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Concerning non-responses , the main effect of Time-point was significant, F (1,18) = 22.55; p = 0.0001; μ 2 = 0.556, whereas the Group x Time-point interaction was marginally significant, F (1,18) = 4.38; p = 0.051; μ 2 = 0.195.

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.077so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Specifically, the change in non-responses did not reach statistical significance in the experimental group after the treatment, F (1,18) = 3.53; p = 0.077, which suggests that patients did not improve on the basis of a non-responding strategy.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.