Should we add visual acuity ratios to referral criteria for potential cerebral visual impairment?

J Optom · 2017 · PMC5383453 · PMID 26896051

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0500

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0500

boldest claim

The sentences

nearly significantp = 0.05actually significant

The difference between group 1 and 3 was nearly significant ( t w (28.9) = −2.09, p = 0.05) and the ratio in group 3 was significantly higher than that in group 2 ( t w (40) = 3.20, p < 0.01).

also in 3,349 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.