Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Exploring Modality Compatibility in the Response-Effect Compatibility Paradigm.

Adv Cogn Psychol · 2017 · PMC5404091 · PMID 28450976

2
hedged sentences
0.1140
closest p · 2.3× alpha
0.1140
boldest claim

The sentences

a nonsignificant trendp = .114not close (p > 0.1)
There was a nonsignificant trend towards an interaction, F (1, 23) = 2.696, p = .114, η p 2 = .105, showing that the R-E compatibility effect tended to be more pronounced with visual-verbal effect code (i.e., number words, 35 ms) than with visual-symbolic effect code (i.e., digits, 9 ms; see Figure 3 ).

also in 5,406 other papers

clearly significantno p-value reported
The fact that the REC effect with the vocal-visual R-E mapping was clearly significant in Experiment 1 but not in Experiment 2 might be due to the lengthened R-E delay in Experiment 2 relative to Experiment 1.

also in 627 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.