“clearly significant”

This raises the question whether the observed alteration in mib1 ta52b mutant neural tube proportions may be a secondary consequence of this reduction in cell number? Our observations argue against this hypothesis: First, the injection of NICD promotes a partial but clearly significant (p = 1.14E-08) restoration of neural tube proportions (Fig. 8p,q ) while triggering only a minor and non-significant (p = 0.129) increase in neural tube cell number (Supplementary Fig.

The computed probability p(uncorrel) reveals that the correlation is clearly significant because the probability that r is equal to zero is far below 0.05 ( p = 5.31 × 10 −07 ).

Beginning with occurrence as source language and LPI rank, we note that the correlation is positive, not exceptionally strong, but clearly significant ( R = 0.41, p = 3.9e-05).

A difference from global connectivity is that in this case the difference between healthy and control subjects is clearly significant (p-value < 0.0001).

In Figure 2 as well as in Figure 3 of their study ( 1 ) they demonstrated a clearly significant difference between the TYM scores between controls and AD patients as well as between moderate AD and severe AD patients (both p < 0.0001).

Regardless of such variability in RA patients, there was a clearly significant difference between both groups (RA mean 1.2 ± 3.18% [0–19.50%] vs. healthy control mean 0.07 ± 0.1% [0–0.59%], p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 b upper panel).

Nevertheless, the effect was clearly significant and similar in magnitude, to that it was found in the model without controlling, considering the subset of patients ≥70 years old (absolute increase = 2.8%; p < 0.001) and of the male gender (absolute increase = 2%, p = 0.03).

Results: The tests of significance showed that the effects of sex, age, waist circumference, family history obesity and frequency of breakfast days were clearly significant ( P < 0.001).

Interestingly, the percentage of early apoptotic cells in HSA:HSA condition remained low whereas the AbIX:AlbIX condition showed a higher percentage that was clearly significant at the 72 h time point (p < 0.001).

Plots suggested modest skew but the Cook–Weisberg test was clearly significant ( p < .001).

The influence of metabolic control is such that when the healthy control and the well-controlled groups were combined and compared to the poorly controlled patients, the difference in DNA methylation remained clearly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Fig. 1E ).

Six-month-old infants had clearly significant preferences for the top halves of cat faces, t (56) = 5.09, p < 0.001, d = 0.67, and monkey faces, t (56) = 5.10, p < 0.001, d = 0.68.

Confirming the MS data, T cells had intracellular levels of C3, and confirming the translocation observed in the MS data, the quantitative data from the images of C3 staining showed slightly higher C3 abundance in the nucleus compared to the cytosol upon TCR stimulation which was clearly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 2D ).

Again, all three main effects turned out clearly significant, confirming the pattern from the individual experiments (all F > 31.33, all p < .001).

We observed a clearly significant difference among ALN status in patients with Her-2 positive (P = 0.001) and Luminal B (P < 0.0001) breast cancer.

For PAS 2–4 there was a clearly significant effect of illusion (for all tests, Chi 2 (3) > 51.6, p < .001).

Reversing the causal ordering (hs-CRP → index → CircS) changed the picture: both the CHG index and METS-IR produced clearly significant indirect effects (both ACME P < 0.001), pointing toward a model in which systemic inflammation feeds into CircS risk partly by perturbing atherogenic lipid handling and insulin homeostasis.

To handle possible regression toward the mean biases, we also checked these changes with ANCOVA using the baseline value as a covariate; the cluster differences remained clearly significant ( P <0.001) for the changes related to both time points for NRS-7d, pain severity, pain interference, and life control.

Statistical analyses The full model was clearly significant when compared to the null model (likelihood ratio test: χ 2 = 65.997, df = 8, P < 0.001), specifically showing age and sampling period as significant predictors (Table 1 ).

fulleborni : χ 2 = 0.085, df = 2, P = 0.958), for the strongylid nematode it was clearly significant (χ 2 = 14.448, df = 2, P = 0.001; Table 6 ).

While the upregulation of Daf-21 up_2 is slightly weaker in the first experiment (UpRegScore of 70, 97 and 97, respectively), it is still clearly significant when compared to 100 random gene sets (UpRegScore: 3.7 ± 6.2, p<0.001) ( Fig 3A ).

Even with non-cooperative subjects included in the human sample, there was a clearly significant between-species difference in the group analysis both between Experiment 1 and 2 (W = 175, p = 0.001) and between Experiment 2 and 3 (W = 177, p = 0.03).

The difference between the three populations is clearly significant according to the ANOVA test ( P <0.001).

Moreover, accounting for effects explainable by those on generic psychopathology reduced the magnitude of the pre- and postnatal anxiety by stroking interaction effect on irritability by just 12%, and with improved precision this interaction effect on irritability remained clearly significant (p = 0.003).

Table 1 depicts the results of an analysis of consanguinity among all participants, indicating similar results to those for first-degree cousins, with a P value close to statistical significance for malformations ( P =.067) and a clearly significant association with CHD ( P =.003).