A negative trend was noticed with increasing ER expression and SUVmax of 18 F-FDG, however P trend was not significant ( P trend 0.118).
← all excerpts
Can <sup>18</sup>F-Fluoroestradiol Positron Emission Tomography Become a New Imaging Standard in the Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer Patient: A Prospective Comparative Study with <sup>18</sup>F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography?
2
—
—
The sentences
P value was not significant with the level of ER expression and 18 F-FDG or 18 F-FES SUVmax; however, a positive trend was seen with 18 F-FES SUVmax and ER expression ( P trend 0.011).