did not achieve significancep = 0.054
However, this difference did not achieve significance ( Figure 3(f) , Groups, F 1,22 = 4.14, p = 0.054).
However, this difference did not achieve significance ( Figure 3(f) , Groups, F 1,22 = 4.14, p = 0.054).
This slowing was most apparent in the MCAO group, but failed to achieve significance (U = 29 & 24, n.s.).
Within our study, the staircase deficit was stable across blocks 2–4 of training, and approached significance on block 5.