nominally significantP = 0.037
Interestingly, two SNPs were also nominally significant (rs929626 with P = 0.037 and rs17543752 with P = 0.05) in the same direction as in the GWAS (Table 1 ) .
Interestingly, two SNPs were also nominally significant (rs929626 with P = 0.037 and rs17543752 with P = 0.05) in the same direction as in the GWAS (Table 1 ) .