Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation.

Sci Rep · 2017 · PMC5500476 · PMID 28684800

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0510

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0560

boldest claim

The sentences

almost significantp = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was an almost significant interaction between proximity and order ( F (1, 18) = 4.38, p = 0.051, ηp 2 = 0.196).

also in 1,858 other papers

just failed to reach significancep = 0.056so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The interaction between proximity and order just failed to reach significance ( F (1, 21) = 4.08, p = 0.056, ηp 2 = 0.163.

also in 279 other papers

just failed to reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

Interestingly, the difference between Near and Far conditions just failed to reach statistical significance for the second stimulus.

also in 203 other papers

near-significantno p-value reported

We further investigated this near-significant interaction.

also in 2,306 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.