When 'Sanctity of Life' and 'Self-Determination' clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 - implications for policy and practice.

J Med Ethics · 2017 · PMC5520012 · PMID 28642353

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

hugely significantno p-value reported

3 4 The Briggs case is hugely significant, then, for its potential to reverse the effect of W v M and for the signal it sends to everyone involved that CANH may not be in the best interests of all MCS patients. § The significance of Briggs for everyday practice The Briggs case was described by the presiding judge as one that engages fund

also in 172 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.