borderline significantP = 0.08
The perfusion fraction was higher in the non-progression group, which was significant for reader 2 ( P = 0.03) and borderline significant for reader 1 ( P = 0.08).
The perfusion fraction was higher in the non-progression group, which was significant for reader 2 ( P = 0.03) and borderline significant for reader 1 ( P = 0.08).
On visual analysis of ASL images, increased perfusion at SCWEs was more commonly observed in the non-progression group than in the progression group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance.