Cue avoidance training and inhibitory control training for the reduction of alcohol consumption: a comparison of effectiveness and investigation of their mechanisms of action.

The movement × condition interaction was not significant for control pictures ( F (1, 58) = .72, p = .40), but it was marginally significant for alcohol pictures ( F (1,58) = 3.92 p = .05).

also in 26,082 other papers

The hypothesized four-way interaction time × picture type × movement × condition approached significance ( F (1,58) = 3.47 p = .07), and there were no other significant main effects or interactions (Fs < 2.53, ps > .12).

also in 8,237 other papers

However, we did observe a notable trend in that all participants were faster to approach alcohol rather than avoid alcohol pictures before CBM; after CAT, this ‘approach bias’ was maintained in the sham training (control) group, but it was eliminated in the group that received active CAT.

also in 2,380 other papers