Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines.

BMC Med Res Methodol · 2005 · PMC553981 · PMID 15715916

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

only marginally significantp < .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In the fifth review, a significant difference between experimental and control interventions was detected when all trials were synthesized that became only marginally significant (p < .07) when the meta-analysis was adjusted for study quality [ 30 ].

also in 5,076 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.