Adjustment for intermediate signal-intensities resulted in a reduction in infarct size for both manual and visual categories (MANUAL vs MANUAL-ISI, 27.2% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001; VISUAL vs VISUAL-ISI, 20.4% vs 16.8%, p = 0.012); Differences between MANUAL-ISI and VISUAL-ISI did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.39).
← all excerpts
Sources of variability in quantification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance infarct size - reproducibility among three core laboratories.
1
0.3900
0.3900