highly significantp < 10 −57
The improvement was highly significant for both data types (MU: p < 10 −57 , SU: p < 10 −32 ; Wilcoxon signed-rank tests), and significantly higher for the MU sample ( p < 10 −25 ; Wilcoxon rank-sum test).
The improvement was highly significant for both data types (MU: p < 10 −57 , SU: p < 10 −32 ; Wilcoxon signed-rank tests), and significantly higher for the MU sample ( p < 10 −25 ; Wilcoxon rank-sum test).
The difference between the best p gain and fixed p gain{exc,inh} settings was not significant ( p = 0.324, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), and the small decreased observed in the best p gain{exc,inh} setting relative to the fixed p gain{exc,inh} and best p gain settings reached borderline significance ( p = 0.030 and p = 0.003, respectively, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests).