Barely Significant
← all phrases

reached borderline significance

83 sentences · 83 papers · 408 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0509

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

reached borderline significancep = 0.0430.9× alphagold
Among inflammatory indices, NLR, SII, SIRI, and PIV values were significantly higher in PGDM compared to controls ( p -values ranging from 0.01 to 0.03), while PLR, MLR, and MII-1 to MII-3 showed no statistically significant differences across all groups, with the exception of MII-3 which reached borderline significance ( p = 0.043) (Table 3 ).
reached borderline significancep = 0.0450.9× alphagold
For VEDO we added analysis of the disease extension, where E1/E2 versus E3/E4 reached borderline significance when added to the linear mixed model being positively associated with higher F-CPT ( β 1.915, 95% CI 0.1696–3.6621, p = 0.045).
reached borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
No clearly significant difference was observed between the sexes either, though p-value reached borderline significance (z test z = 1.93, p = 0.05): age-standardized incidence was 1.86/100,000 (95% CI 1.65–2.07) for men and 2.16/100,000 (95% CI 1.94–2.39) for women, so confidence intervals were largely overlapping.
reached borderline significanceP = 0.0501.0× alphagold
In multivariable analyses, the time period when the operation was performed reached borderline significance as an independent prognostic factor for DMFS in LPS ( P = 0.050) and was statistically significant when comparing TP1 versus TP3 (HR 3.21, P = 0.025) and TP2 versus TP3 (HR 2.87, P = 0.029) separately ( Table S3 ).
reached borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
Superficial SWIs data were available from 8 studies: RAD was associated with a significant, over 45% reduction of the odds of SSWI: OR (95%CIs): 0.54 (0.32–0.90); p = 0.01; I 2 = 63%; that reached borderline significance in gentamicin studies (0.55 (0.30–1.01); p = 0.05; I 2 = 70%; P heterogeneity for between subgroups comparison = 0.71.
reached borderline significanceP = .051.0× alphagold
While the one-year mortality reduction for SupraMR vs MR reached borderline significance (RR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.38–0.99, P = .05), the HR comparison did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.36–1.12, P = .09).
reached borderline significanceP =0.0511.0× alphagold
The mean infarct volume at 48 hours (Table 4 ; Figure 2 B) did not significantly differ in RIC+ mice compared with RIC− mice in the unadjusted analysis (27.8 versus 32.5 mm3; mean difference, −4.7 [95% CI, −10.2 to 0.9]; P =0.097), but this difference reached borderline significance in the sex-stratified analysis ( P =0.051).